A program similar to mine caught my attention for the 2:15 P.M. slot, "Literacy through comic art." The energy and passion of the three presenters for the subject was palpable, the collaboration between school librarian and classroom teachers, even in separate school districts, was admirable, and the bibliography was helpful; I will be referring to some of the professional literature they cite (specifically, Mike Schmoker's
Results Now book) for my own graphic novel programs of the future. I find it intriguing that the teachers use Scott McCloud's
Understanding Comics as the textbook for their class, as a framework for their instruction, as I also believe it's the best reference for accessing the literary elements of graphic novels.
Collecting the handouts from the MAME
Presentations Wiki page helps augment my attendance at the conference, because, as
stated earlier, it's frustrating to make the choice about which session to attend when there are compelling concurrent choices. And even when attending sessions themselves, having access to the presentations allows the attendee the ability to download the material, digest it, and perhaps even extend it for their own use. It's a copy and paste world, as long as we properly
cite our sources.
My
program was scheduled for the unfortunate 'after lunch' period at 1:00 P.M., and I somehow pulled it off, despite the two folks that fell asleep. Coming off the lunch hour, I was able to access the room early and set up the laptop, projector, plug in the power cords and speaker wires, arrange the
handouts and biscotti, and still leave plenty of time to go over my notes. It was notable that MAME 34 equipment chair, and former
GLPS Technology Director,
Steve Wyckoff, helped by providing speakers and a longer monitor cable. I thought to bring biscotti because of a story an old friend and colleague of mine from
Isle Royale National Park told me back in 1992: he brought
grinders to his
thesis defense to encourage a bit of warm interest.
My presentation style -- whether thanking parents and giving awards at a sports banquet or lecturing students on
information literacy in the
library or giving a chat like this -- is to pace around, involve the entire audience. In the library with our students, this pacing between tables amongst the listeners is a synergy between the activity and brain function, but primarily it's crowd control, pure and simple. One can only hope that when presenting in other venues, away from students, that behavior is one of the last worries for the presenter. Time and timing were issues, as when I glanced at my watch to note that there was scant 10 minutes remaining, yet I hadn't covered a significant portion of my program, including the booktalking/
bibliography.
A critical self analysis told me that having my watch on my wrist, and referring to it thusly, was a bit brusque. Some other points that I will change for the future: curiously, and I am aware, that I address the audience on my left side more than my right, which should be more balanced; my
slides will contain the covers of the books I'm discussing, and I will scan and provide the literary examples I want to discuss in the presentation as well; the statistical reports I ran from our
library automation software will also be embedded in the presentation, rather than in the separate
application (which I initially felt lended more authenticity).
Thursday evening I was treated to dinner at the
Aerie, an eye-popping 16th floor restaurant within the
Grand Traverse Resort. We were seated on the western side of the facility, affording a great view of the
Bay, and the sunset. The
food was mixed: the pumpkin soup was a surprise treat, the
Oberon was its usual brilliance, the beef short rib entree was fatty and wanting, yet the prices were akin to the view: outrageous. Friday, I took a slightly
alternate route on the way home, something more direct from the Grand Traverse Resort, and more rural, which was a delight considering the weather and the leaves. The drive, as my commuting colleagues say, clears the head.